View Single Post
Old 07-06-2013, 08:59 PM   #77
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,424
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres View Post
In any debate over allegations of predatory prices I'll take the word of a Federal Judge experienced in antitrust issues over a random publishing industry apologist at Salon.
Are you talking about her ruling against dismissal of the case?* Or are you referencing the statement she made at the pre-trial conference?**

If the former, it probably was about what you expect with a failed motion to dismiss.

If the latter, the statement seemed, on its face, to show a lack of open-mindedness on the eve of trial. If so, she's not a good judge. But I think she was just trying to pressure the last remaining defendant (Apple) to settle. The real reason she pressured Apple to settle may be that with all the open judicial seats, she's swamped with work.


______________

* http://www.pjstar.com/free/x10359547...#axzz2YJcQFhCC

** http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2013/05/...titrust-judge/

Last edited by SteveEisenberg; 07-06-2013 at 09:01 PM.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote