Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul
I've never said that it was.
The settlement proposed that Google themselves would directly sell ebooks based on the scans that they had made, not just link to authorised versions that the creators had already made available. That is what I have been saying is so clearly a copyright violation I'm amazed there is even a discussion about it.
|
And as I have been saying, that settlement is irrelevant. We might as well argue about what Romney would have done as president of the U.S.
In any event, I think we can agree there's probably going to be some interesting litigation on orphan works in the future, but otherwise we've exhausted this argument.