View Single Post
Old 07-06-2013, 03:05 PM   #42
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ninjalawyer View Post
Just as a general comment, why do you think it is so much worse for authors if Google digitizes books and provides links to bookstores that sell that book (including Google's own bookstore)? Why should transforming paper books into searchable digital books be morally okay, but linking those books to a retail store be so repugnant?
I've never said that it was.
The settlement proposed that Google themselves would directly sell ebooks based on the scans that they had made, not just link to authorised versions that the creators had already made available. That is what I have been saying is so clearly a copyright violation I'm amazed there is even a discussion about it.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote