Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemurion
I found the title startling- and expected the thread to be about someone suing a spouse or former spouse for insisting on sex too often.
Otherwise it sounds like a perfectly standard workers compensation case. The only thing I found a little surprising was the fact she was actually masturbating as I thought most such sex workers did not actually masturbate but rather imitated the sounds of masturbation.
Otherwise it's work says do 'x' -- employee is injured doing 'x' -- pretty straightforward.
|
I thought pretty much the same thing. It should have been a regular worker's comp case ... but apparently she had to sue the employer to get coverage. Which is just wrong.
For those who think of it as a joke ... I'd be really interested to find out why it's supposed to be a joke. The only thing that take it out of the ordinary is the fact that the woman was a sex worker.
So, if I understand the joke correctly, anytime a sex worker is injured, that is supposed to be funny. Is a serial killer who targets sex workers also funny? I mean, if an injured sex worker is funny, I would think a dead sex worker would be downright hilarious.
Jack the Ripper must have been one of the UK's greatest comics. Who knew?