View Single Post
Old 07-04-2013, 07:58 PM   #28
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,441
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Googling, I have been unable to find the methodology for this 2004-2005 survey. I think that's because this is market research where the full report is expensive.

The same outfit asks different questions every year, and if you look here, on the last page, the 2012 methodology is crypticly summarized:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/99090098/2...World-Factbook

For the more affluent countries, it appears to now to be an internet survey -- or maybe they are sampling everyone and excluding those who admit not to using the internet. For the less wealthy nations, there is an "SES exclusion." In other words, they don't interview villagers or slum dwellers.

So they seem to be comparing affluent urbanites in China and India with average income people in western nations.

Totally unclear, following links from the LA Times article, is whether the time estimates are for book reading, or all reading.

Last edited by SteveEisenberg; 07-04-2013 at 10:08 PM.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote