Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer
Aaaaaand we're back full circle. 
Look. The legality of an agency pricing model is not in question. The legality of agency pricing is, in fact, completely irrelevant to the charge of conspiracy, here. It's quite possible to illegally conspire to bring about an otherwise perfectly legal pricing model. Why is that so hard to grasp? |
It is hard when it is *apple* up in irons walking the plank.
And when all the evidence points at St Stephen of Jobs as the instigator and ringleader.
If it were B&N on the docket the same folks would be tsk-tsking with the rest of us.