Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres
That will only unleash another wave of revisionistic FUD bemoaning how the special snowflake is now going to melt or (in the event the judge buys apple's hairsplitting, unlikely as it seems) more spin on how the heroic establishment stood up to amazon for the right to collude and ripoff consumers.
BTW, I figure next friday 5PM.
|
I see. So if the judge doesn't rule the way you want her to, then it's because she bought into Apple's hairspliting and spin, rather than, unlike you, she actually listened to and read all the evidence? Interesting. Regardless, I suspect that if she rules within the next few weeks, then it's a sign that she thinks the ruling is very straight forward rather than a close decision.