View Single Post
Old 06-30-2013, 11:18 PM   #119
PatNY
Zennist
PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.PatNY ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
PatNY's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,022
Karma: 47809468
Join Date: Jul 2010
Device: iPod Touch, Sony PRS-350, Nook HD+ & HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg View Post
Of course not. But as documented in my link in #98, it would be equally mistaken to say that all firms do it.
Name one major multinational corporation that deals with digital media and IP on a major scale like Amazon does who doesn't do it.

Apple and Google do the same exact thing Amazon does, and in the case of Apple, the accusations of tax avoidance through their Irish "shell" companies are significantly more extreme than what Amazon has been accused of.

Quote:
You earlier said it was a "gray area of the law." If so, they didn't know.
No, Amazon knew the laws and according to precedent and their own legal counsel they were acting within those laws. It's the British authorities who are seeing "gray" when it comes to Amazon's physical operations in the UK.

--Pat

Last edited by PatNY; 06-30-2013 at 11:24 PM.
PatNY is offline   Reply With Quote