View Single Post
Old 06-30-2013, 08:56 PM   #113
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,435
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PatNY View Post
. . . it is still a gray area of the law which has yet to be clarified
This is highly plausible.

Aren't there HM Revenue corporate income tax officials one can contact to ask about those gray areas? And do you think Amazon managers cared enough about not being seen as ugly Americans to do so?

Suppose I was visiting Britain and was unsure of the museum fee. It has happened. Should I just pay the lower amount and hope they won't care? I say no. As a guest in a (slightly) foreign country, I ask.

I suppose the Amazon approach would be to tell the British clerk that, despite what's in front of your eyes, I'm really in Luxembourg, and thus should pay nothing
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote