View Single Post
Old 06-26-2013, 07:51 AM   #27
WillAdams
Wizard
WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.WillAdams ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
WillAdams's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,258
Karma: 3439432
Join Date: Feb 2008
Device: Amazon Kindle Paperwhite (300ppi), Samsung Galaxy Book 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
It really, really wouldn't.
A clean room reimplementation is not copyright violation.
AMD produced completely Intel-compatible CPUs using the same process. One team would example the Intel CPU and produce a complete specification of how it worked. A second team would take that specification and produce a compatible CPU of their own. As long as team two never actually see the original CPU, this is clean.
Electronic chips are functional devices, and as such, the copyright is inherent in the implementations, and the courts have ruled that a specification for a device cannot be a creative work worthy of copyright --- there is no such ruling for the description of a book's cover image, esp. one so detailed as to essentially allow re-creation, and a number of court cases going the other way, and a myriad number of times when the settlement was reached out of court in the original designer's favour.
WillAdams is offline   Reply With Quote