View Single Post
Old 06-24-2013, 09:33 PM   #157
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,435
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by leebase View Post
Apple is going to win this because there is no proof of conspiracy....
You're on a pretty long limb here. Only the judge knows how she is going to rule. And maybe not even her, as she has weeks more time to make up her mind. Perhaps a law clerk will sway her. Just hope that clerk isn't on this board

By the way, what I would call proof isn't needed for a finding against a company in a civil antitrust case like this. Even with criminal antitrust, all conviction requires is for the government's claims to be more likely true than not true.

Last edited by SteveEisenberg; 06-24-2013 at 09:35 PM.
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote