View Single Post
Old 06-22-2013, 09:42 PM   #116
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,427
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgaiser View Post
And of course you have documentation on those massive losses, right? Cause, you know, Amazon has already shown that they were making a profit overall in their ebook line.
Sounds plausible. But showing it would require making accounting assumptions about how to allocate, between business areas, items like taxes, corporate buildings, executive pay, and software development. Did they release all that?

Before agency, Amazon took losses on books widely sold by competitiors while keeping prices high on less popular books. Here's an example of the sort of book (and one I've been meaning to read) that they wouldn't likley sell at a loss.

I see the same author now has a popular book -- one I'll definitely read -- that is published by Bloomsberry of Harry Potter fame:

http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Shoot-Fel...1950543&sr=1-1

Kindle edition is $9.89. Kobo sells it for $11.99. I wonder what Amazon and Kobo pay.

Last edited by SteveEisenberg; 06-23-2013 at 11:43 AM. Reason: spelling and grammar
SteveEisenberg is online now   Reply With Quote