View Single Post
Old 06-21-2013, 02:35 PM   #392
DiapDealer
Grand Sorcerer
DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DiapDealer ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DiapDealer's Avatar
 
Posts: 28,705
Karma: 205039118
Join Date: Jan 2010
Device: Nexus 7, Kindle Fire HD
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
What I have said is that just reading a sample can never tell you if the book is really good or just OK.
Of course it can't. But it can certainly be used (and rather quickly at that) to determine if someone can't spell or doesn't have a firm grasp of grammar or syntax. Which -- if this thread is anything to go by -- seems to be far and away the main complaint with regard to indies being declared "rubbish." Maybe I'm just missing them, but I haven't exactly seen a lot of "indies are just OK where I'm partial to extraordinary" complaints flying around (your posts not withstanding, of course).

I don't think anybody ever claimed samples could differentiate between "really good" or "just OK." Only that they could be used to quickly eliminate marginally-literate spew and/or to help someone decide whether or not they might take a chance on something when the sample didn't do anything to discourage their curiosity about a particular work.
DiapDealer is offline   Reply With Quote