Quote:
Originally Posted by theonna
That is the thing- you have your own tools to manage your library. Including, it seems, the things you created yourself.
Having them gives you advantage over anyone else who cant create tools themselves. So you are uniquely equipped to handle things you need. What I'd like to have is opportunity to deal with library organizing without "batch programming, python programming in calibre, batch processing". Easy way, without going further is- file manager, does not require professional programming skills, does not require lengthy book processing, tag editing, works with any language that supports unicode. You can bash inadequacies of file manager all you like, but it is still a better system than what we have on Kobo now.
This thread asks everyone if they could benefit from having a file manager, I know I would. You know you wont. Still does not make it a wrong idea, especially for now when most of us do not have your skills or your tools.
|
But that's a different approach. You want it, I understand it. What I don't get is you telling me I must acknowledge the advantages of browser for ME. That I have to acknowledge that it's a good idea for ME, as I read the message I was answering.
I won't write anything at the thread about improving user interface in Kobo, when people talk about file manager advantages and disadvantages. I won't say to anybody that a file manager is not a good idea for him/her. But I'm not going to request a file manager either.