Quote:
Originally Posted by davidfor
That makes two of us. The Aura is supposed to be faster than the Glo and definitely faster than the Touch. I do have less books, but I that shouldn't affect the shelf list performance. Number of shelves should have an affect and the number of books on them should as well.
The only thing I can think is that when you removed your old shelves and replaced them with the author shelves, the database was cleaned up. Maybe the mass insertions needed for this caused a rebuild of the indexes.
I agree with you there. Displaying a list of 1200 books with covers sounds harder then counting the books for the shelves. But, it is faster. I suppose they have had more time to work on it and see it more often.
Nothing I can think of. But, my brain is broken from spending the day trying to work out why the comms at one of a customers sites is so much slower than all of their other sites.
Have you tried PeterT's recipe for a Finished shelf? |
Yes that is what I use, I accidentally deleted them from driver configuration when changing from author to series.
Quote:
|
The only thing I can think is that when you removed your old shelves and replaced them with the author shelves, the database was cleaned up. Maybe the mass insertions needed for this caused a rebuild of the indexes.
|
The only time I got the processing content message was when I put back the 73 book collection, which was when I would expect a database cleanup, then I added no books, just changed the driver configuration to put all books with no series in a single collection and the time almost tripled.
Next I changed to series collections from author collections with the same largish collection of no series and the time was much faster.
I will change it back just out of curiosity.
Helen
But I will change it back to what it was