View Single Post
Old 06-16-2013, 07:52 PM   #24
SteveEisenberg
Grand Sorcerer
SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.SteveEisenberg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,424
Karma: 43514536
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: near Philadelphia USA
Device: Kindle Kids Edition, Fire HD 10 (11th generation)
"inconsistent" and "not consistent" aren't identical. In expository prose, the former is preferable because one should avoid unnecessary words.

And if you randomly change "inconsistent" and "not consistent," in the paragraph above, the meaning will be lost.

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumIguana View Post
It would be easy to defeat this.
Yes, as with metadata watermarking where the book presented to the user doesn't change. But some uploaders wouldn't bother, and become examples of the legal peril of such activities. Also, you could prove someone had an unauthorized copy even if you couldn't prove who was the original purchaser.

I'm for watermarking, but not to the point where it mars the text. Then, I think DRM is a reasonably good idea, so what do I know?
SteveEisenberg is offline   Reply With Quote