View Single Post
Old 06-12-2013, 05:46 AM   #146
MikeB1972
Gnu
MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MikeB1972 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,222
Karma: 15625359
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Device: BeBook,JetBook Lite,PRS-300-350-505-650,+ran out of space to type
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Especially in cases where the writer would not have used an adjective had the person being described been a man. If a writer uses the expression "lady editor" in a situation where they would not have said "gentleman editor", that's both condescending and sexist.
Mostly I'd agree with you, except, you normally have expectations of the gender of a person when discussing some roles (and I'll admit to not knowing enough about publishing to know if that is the case here), and if the gender is not the one that automatically comes to mind you add the gender - think of the stag party if they book a stripper and get a male stripper

Similarly you have others where you wouldn't mention the gender for the opposite because it is assumed :-
women's football teams
male cheerleaders
honest politicians
women racing drivers
ladyboys (confusing enough already without stripping out gender references)
white rapper
male model
male nanny
female jockey
etc

OK, I admit I was going to add something for Liverpudlian's but held back

Bring on the flames
MikeB1972 is offline   Reply With Quote