View Single Post
Old 06-10-2013, 04:05 PM   #128
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,393
Karma: 68715774
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by DiapDealer View Post
'Lady' as a noun, makes no one frown.
Ah, it's 'lady' as an adjective that is at issue.

Is it the entire idea of differentiating by gender?

Like 'male nurse' should now just be 'nurse?'

If so, I get that. No need to call out the gender of a nurse, or a race car driver, or an editor in passing mention.

Surely though, there are times when the small difference of gender (vive la différence) within an occupation are indeed relevant to a discussion. In those cases, is the word 'lady' as an adjective, still considered condescending?
What's the PC term? "Female?" "X Chromsome-gifted?"


ApK

Quote:
Well, then you are sexist, Timmy, because you think of Suzy as your 'lady friend' and not just your 'friend.'
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote