Quote:
Originally Posted by FizzyWater
With this series, since people have made it clear they've just begun it, I guess I can understand this request. But on the other hand, I think it's a bit unrealistic to expect folks to put spoiler tags on any older book they discuss ever.
For example, I've never read a Connie Mason book. But I would never expect anyone discussing one of her 10-year-old book (or even 1 year old) to put spoiler tags on it!
I guess I'm used to belonging to groups where the most recent book gets spoiler tags for a certain amount of time (depending on when it gets released around the globe, since usually the release dates aren't the same), but older books are fair game.
|
We've always used spoiler tags no matter what book was being discussed. It's just good net etiquette. When I've talk about 50 Shades or REAL or the book I was reviewing anything that contained spoilers has been encased in spoilers tags. I started doing this when I saw others doing it here years ago. It doesn't meant you can't discuss a book it just means anything that would give away say the ending or the mystery of the book it would just be wrong to talk about openly. It's okay to talk about the book and what you thought about it and things like that. I don't consider talking about things you can find in a blurb spoilers either.