[JoeD]

Originally Posted by SteveEisenberg

The Times prints clear-cut corrections almost every day. In this case, their position is that no correction was warranted. It's true that the public editor, who speaks for herself, printed a mildly critical column.

As for calling the Times writer a liar, here is another POV:

http://techland.time.com/2013/02/26/...#ixzz2VCaSHVP7

A balanced reviewer would have noted that they spent time driving around looking for the hookup and used up more battery in the process. A good reviewer may have taken the time to point out how hard it is to find the charge points in the dark and maybe that should addressed. A headline grabbing reviewer will omit those points.