View Single Post
Old 06-04-2013, 08:09 AM   #104
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crusader View Post
So you would only count the times the eInk device is actually refreshing the pages as actual use (excluding the time it's being read)?
I would count the time spent actually reading the book.
Seems like the obvious thing to count.

Does anyone seriously think that comparing one figure which is measured in days (but you can only use the device for half an hour a day) with another measured in hours (of constant use) is meaningful?

Lets say a new tablet is released with 10x the battery life of current ones.
So it lasts for 100 hours of continuous use.
With the current advertising of eInk devices, they would claim a month of use for the eInk device vs 4 days for the tablet. Whereas in reality you could read for far longer on the tablet than the eInk device.
It is simply misleading. The only purpose is advertising copy. eInk device battery lives used to be measured in page turns, until Amazon and B&N got into an advertising war about battery life.

Last edited by murraypaul; 06-04-2013 at 08:13 AM.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote