View Single Post
Old 06-03-2013, 04:13 PM   #98
BoldlyDubious
what if...?
BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.BoldlyDubious ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
BoldlyDubious's Avatar
 
Posts: 209
Karma: 750870
Join Date: Feb 2011
Device: paper & electrophoretic
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
I wish people would stop repeating this misleading comparison.
Yes, eInk readings have a battery life of a month, if you only use it for half an hour a day.
Yes, tablets tend to have a battery life of about 10 hours, if you use it continuously.
Those figures are not in any way comparable.
My ebook reader is on for a couple of hours a day, and gets charged maybe once every two or three weeks. (Including the odd week-end in standby, when I forget to turn it off.)
An e-reader uses very little power except for the brief time intervals when the screen is refreshed. If you use it to read books or documents, actual battery life is measured in whole days. Of course this is true only if you keep the wireless network off!
(Tablets, on the contrary, require significant power just to keep the screen backlight on, and tend to have much faster -and power hungry- processors.)
So: yes, those figures are comparable.

Last edited by BoldlyDubious; 06-03-2013 at 04:17 PM.
BoldlyDubious is offline   Reply With Quote