|
Well, but the thing is, Steve, many of us do feel that DRM is more of a hindrance to legitimate customers than it is to pirates, and that the hoped for advantages are grossly outweighed by the disadvantages. Even those of us who do think that authors should be remunerated for every copy of their book that a customer actually reads (or downloads, or whatever the author has specified as the criterion) can reasonably disagree that DRM is a good way of guaranteeing that. I don't think if someone posts that they think DRM is disadvantageous, or even that they think that authors should be paid a flat rate per book rather than a royalty, that it is necessarily a personal attack on you.
|