View Single Post
Old 09-15-2008, 02:31 PM   #97
axel77
Fanatic
axel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-books
 
Posts: 584
Karma: 914
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: iliad
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
In the British legal system, the loser generally has to pay both side's legal costs. That's one reason that we don't have the issue of frivolous court cases so common in the US.
Is this is a slip, or is this on purpose the wrong way around than I'd believe is the case. In europe we don't have the issue of frivolous court cases so common than in the US, because if you lose you have to pay the costs of the one you filed a case against also. Also this system makes it far less problematic what in the US is famishing the opponent, that is to prolong the case until he is out of money. In europe this won't work, since if you are pretty sure you gonna win, you can go forever in the case, since the your opponnent will have to pay all your costs, and the longer he prolongs the case if he is losing, the more expensive it will be for him.
axel77 is offline   Reply With Quote