Thread: About Tidy
View Single Post
Old 05-29-2013, 11:16 AM   #10
roger64
Wizard
roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.roger64 ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 2,625
Karma: 3120635
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: Kindle PW3 (wifi)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmikel View Post
If I were them, I would be a little hesitant. It is hard enough to eliminate bugs now, and if they had 20-30 variations of Tidy added, it might make it even harder. But it would be nice to have more options for cleaning if it were reliable and that I think is the crux of the matter.
Now, the Sigil offer for Tidy is "take it or leave it". This is a little misleading because Tidy is conceived to be a -very- flexible tool. As far as Tidy is concerned, it has been widely tested for many years and I think it does not have many bugs left.

But OTOH, opening all the configuration options could nevertheless, as you wisely put it, trigger some new bugs.

And yes, maybe, it would be possible to begin carefully with a middle ground, opening for example some controversial cleaning options (sgc styles somewhere?), and if successful, to add some more for each new version of Sigil.

Last edited by roger64; 05-29-2013 at 11:26 AM.
roger64 is offline   Reply With Quote