View Single Post
Old 05-20-2013, 06:17 PM   #1
tomsem
Grand Sorcerer
tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tomsem ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 6,942
Karma: 27060153
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Device: iPhone 15PM, Kindle Scribe, iPad mini 6, PocketBook InkPad Color 3
"The Science of Paper versus Screens"

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...-paper-screens

I think the "science" is at best exploratory at this point, and am skeptical on many levels about any of the 'conclusions' that are being suggested.

Digital reading is a skill, and digital reading systems and technologies are not all created equal. But the studies referred to don't appear to explore more than one digital reading system. Books aren't equal, either: they can be poorly typeset, cheap paper, or have unpleasant odors.

Also the subjects of the studies likely have a lifetime of experience reading books, but only a few years (if that) with digital reading. Again, it is a skill and brains need to rewire to do it well.

Without reading the methodology, it is impossible to know what they have experimental controls for.

I agree that ebook navigation is not what it ought to be, but digital reading is still in the early stages, and has yet to really tackle the higher-hanging fruit (textbooks, technical) that would really benefit from improved reading systems.

Last edited by tomsem; 05-20-2013 at 06:23 PM.
tomsem is offline   Reply With Quote