View Single Post
Old 05-15-2013, 03:46 PM   #12
RbnJrg
Wizard
RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.RbnJrg ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,804
Karma: 8700631
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Rosario - Santa Fe - Argentina
Device: Kindle 4 NT
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSWolf View Post
What you are suggesting is incorrect.

Code:
@font-face {
font-family: alkaios;
font-style: normal;
font-weight: normal;
src: url(../Fonts/alkaios-regular.ttf);
}
That is correct and if you had read my message, you would notice that it is Sigil's fault for using the wrong CSS validation version.
JSWolf, I'm afraid that you didn't read what I wrote. I said that the CLASS .alkaios was bad defined, not the @font-face definition. The @font definition was CORRECT, but the class .alkaios doesn't have to include the statement src: url(../Fonts/alkaios-regular.ttf); Please, read again my first post; please, read also this page:

http://web.sigil.googlecode.com/git/...bed_fonts.html

And you'll realize that what I said was correct. The issue is not in your @font-face declarations but in the way you are wanting to apply those fonts.

Last edited by RbnJrg; 05-15-2013 at 06:30 PM.
RbnJrg is offline   Reply With Quote