View Single Post
Old 05-10-2013, 01:51 PM   #25
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,392
Karma: 68715774
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenophon View Post
I think, however, that your first sentence indicates that you would agree that the question of whether or not removing DRM violates the DMCA is far from settled law in the U.S. Do I have that right?

Xenophon
There have only been a few cases so far regarding the circumvention provision and whether it applies in a non-copyright-infringing circumstance.
The courts have disagreed with each other.
It's far from settled, and an explicit clarifying change like we're discussing here would be very welcomed....and it would also be fiercely fought by the film industry and others.
Here's one article on the matter from one IP law firm, which clearly has an understandably biased take on the matter:
http://sunsteinlaw.com/the-dmca-re-f...urity-devices/

Last edited by ApK; 05-10-2013 at 01:55 PM.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote