View Single Post
Old 05-09-2013, 09:12 AM   #6
gmw
cacoethes scribendi
gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.gmw ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
gmw's Avatar
 
Posts: 5,818
Karma: 137770742
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Device: Kobo Aura One & H2Ov2, Sony PRS-650
Quote:
Originally Posted by crich70 View Post
I do think it should rhyme if in the proper structure though I agree writer's like Shakespeare manage to have a rhythmic quality in their writing even without rhyme. I remember one 'poem' in a poetry contest I entered. It won the 1st prize though I couldn't see any rhyme or rhythmic qualities in it that identified it as such. My own entry was in rhymed couplets and was about Cupid. Oddly enough all I got was an honorable mention. [...]
I don't mind if a poem doesn't rhyme, but I like to be able to "see" the rhythm - and that's the problem I have with Shakespeare. Perhaps it's my Australian accent, but often it feels as if I have to push the words into unnatural contortions to get the rhythm. (And then I hear someone perform it and think: Ah, so that's how it's done! But as soon as I turn back to the words myself it all vanishes again.)

I liked your poem, but for me (who has openly admitted his ignorance on the subject ) the break in rhythm on the fourth pair lets it down.
gmw is offline   Reply With Quote