View Single Post
Old 05-08-2013, 01:03 PM   #128
murraypaul
Interested Bystander
murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.murraypaul ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,726
Karma: 19728152
Join Date: Jun 2008
Device: Note 4, Kobo One
Quote:
Originally Posted by ApK View Post
Copyright itself gives an implied license. It's only the terms of various licenses that are really at issue.
Arguing about misapplication of the words used to describe the process of acquiring the license is a red-herring, which I think is hindering our ability to form a unified front to bring about more fair terms.
There is a fundamental difference, it is not just a question of words.
With a pBook, I have actual ownership of a physical object, and my right to use or dispose of that object cannot be restricted by the copyright owner.
I only have a license to the content carried within the book.
They can prevent me creating another copy of it, certainly, but they have no say in whether I sell it, lend it, put it on a shelf or set fire to it.
That simply isn't true with an eBook, there is no owned portion, it is all licensed.
murraypaul is offline   Reply With Quote