View Single Post
Old 05-08-2013, 11:59 AM   #125
ApK
Award-Winning Participant
ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ApK ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,389
Karma: 68329346
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NJ, USA
Device: Kindle
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
Price is a factor, as are positive factors of eBooks, such as instant delivery and zero weight; and are negative factors such as no actual ownership, no (or restricted) ability to lend, no ability to resell.
Those three sets of things together to into making a value vs cost determination.
Absolutely. (Although "no actual ownership" is a red-herring that reduces in the equation to exactly the same thing as "restricted ability to lend, no ability to resell.")
So we agree on that, but you still maintain to support Sregener's claim that only a minority weigh the whole middle part of that determination heavily?
I certainly see no evidence of that, and lots of evidence against it.
On the flip side, I have seen evidence, however, that those who weight the last part- the negative aspects- heavily are a minority.

And I notice that you didn't, in your list of factors, say "Price OF EBOOK AS COMPARED TO PAPER" which is the only element of price as a factor that I've ever questioned.

I've never made the argument that price wasn't a factor, speaking of strawmen.

Last edited by ApK; 05-08-2013 at 12:06 PM.
ApK is offline   Reply With Quote