View Single Post
Old 09-10-2008, 12:01 PM   #66
axel77
Fanatic
axel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-booksaxel77 has learned how to read e-books
 
Posts: 584
Karma: 914
Join Date: Mar 2008
Device: iliad
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
It is relevant for you strong claim that "The issue at the centre of the case is that Ms. Rowling, as an author, has an exclusive right to commercially exploit her work. " and that is not true which was shown in the quote.
While already the use of the word "to exploit" comes already with a strong bias... could just as well as "to enrich"... on the other strong bias, or "to mention"... "to base upon"... etc.
axel77 is offline   Reply With Quote