View Single Post
Old 09-10-2008, 11:59 AM   #65
HarryT
eBook Enthusiast
HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.HarryT ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
HarryT's Avatar
 
Posts: 85,556
Karma: 93383099
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis 2, iPad Pro 10.5", iPhone 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompe View Post
It is relevant for you strong claim that "The issue at the centre of the case is that Ms. Rowling, as an author, has an exclusive right to commercially exploit her work. " and that is not true which was shown in the quote.
No, it is absolutely true. If someone else writes a reference guide which is their own material then it's THEIR work. The issue in this case is that Mr Ark had assembled a work from quotes from Ms. Rowling's books; there was next to no material of his in the book; that's where it fell foul of the law.

I note that Mr. Ark is currently writing a book on places in the UK which have featured in the HP books and movies. I wish him every success with it - although it's obviously playing off the back of the success of Ms. Rowling's work, that will undoubtedly be all Mr. Ark's own work, and is, therefore, perfectly OK.
HarryT is offline   Reply With Quote