View Single Post
Old 05-03-2013, 10:25 AM   #42
FJames
Addict
FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.FJames ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 320
Karma: 320941
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
Device: Kobo Touch & Aura
Quote:
Originally Posted by danskmacabre View Post
Now regarding the Aura, apart from it's bigger, is there any other difference between that and the Glo?
The bigger screen is definitely the primary advantage of the Aura, just as the glow light is the main advantage of the Glo over the Touch. 0.8" doesn't seem like a lot, but it adds significantly more text to the page, making it almost equal to a paperback book page. It also allows the home screen to show more, and the web browser is a bit more effective. Unfortunately the down-side is that it makes the whole device proportionately bigger.

The Aura screen has a higher resolution than the Glo, just as the Glo has a higher resolution than the Touch. But really I doubt that most people would notice, aside from photos rendering a little better.

According to Kobo the screen on the Aura is harder and more resistant to scratches and dings. But I don't know anyone who has dared to test that.

Some people think the glow light on the Aura is a bit better. It can be adjusted all the way down to a very low light level for comfortable reading in the dark, lower than the Glo. It doesn't appear blueish. It has no visible edge light leakage (although it's not perfect - mine is very slightly darker along the right side and at the top right corner).

The Aura has 2x the battery capacity, which helps if you are using the glow light a lot. Unfortunately that makes it thicker and heavier (about 1/3 heavier than the Touch or Glo).

The Aura has 2x the memory, 4 Gbytes instead of 2 Gbytes. But I doubt most people would care unless they are storing something other than books (comics have been mentioned).

The processor in the Aura may be slightly faster than the Glo, which is a bit faster than the Touch. Nobody seems to be sure though.

On the down-side, aside from the extra size and weight, the Aura takes a step backward by using a slick hard-plastic case instead of having the soft quilted back and matte surface of previous models.

Personally I doubt I would trade a Glo for an Aura if I were just using it for reading text ebooks. But I did buy the Aura after trying to decide between the Glo and the much more expensive Aura for a week, as an upgrade to my Touch. I have to give credit to Kobo for still trying to innovate in e-readers, even if they don't get everything right.

Last edited by FJames; 05-03-2013 at 10:31 AM.
FJames is offline   Reply With Quote