MobileRead Forums - View Single Post

axel77 · 09-09-2008, 06:40 PM

Lets be said, I don't like Rowling. Nor do I like their modern rewriting of the passion story of jesus now as Harry Potter 7. (yes, HP 7 is pretty much the passion story) She infringed the copyright of the apostels!

Anyhow law should be blind, and it doesn't matter if she is symphatic or not. Or if she is either to much a money-greedy coward to really hint Dumbledore is gay in the books, or an attention whore to invent it out of thin-air ex post. The whole dumbledore story does not matter at all if this ruling is "right" or "wrong", or what this ruling will mean for future books or non-books.

09-09-2008, 06:40 PM	#25
axel77 Fanatic Posts: 584 Karma: 914 Join Date: Mar 2008 Device: iliad	Lets be said, I don't like Rowling. Nor do I like their modern rewriting of the passion story of jesus now as Harry Potter 7. (yes, HP 7 is pretty much the passion story) She infringed the copyright of the apostels! Anyhow law should be blind, and it doesn't matter if she is symphatic or not. Or if she is either to much a money-greedy coward to really hint Dumbledore is gay in the books, or an attention whore to invent it out of thin-air ex post. The whole dumbledore story does not matter at all if this ruling is "right" or "wrong", or what this ruling will mean for future books or non-books. Last edited by axel77; 09-09-2008 at 08:22 PM.