Thread: Is the Aura more durable that non glow e ink screens?
View Single Post
Old 05-02-2013, 09:31 AM   #1
domani7
Enthusiast
domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.domani7 considers 'yay' to be a thoroughly cromulent word.
 
Posts: 37
Karma: 89450
Join Date: Sep 2011
Device: nook
Is the Aura more durable that non glow e ink screens?
Kobo claims that Aura is more durable than other ereaders:

"rest assured that your eReader's screen is durable in the face of scratches and drops. In fact, in a 360º product test, Kobo Aura HD was proven to have the most durable E Ink eReader screen.*"

However! Is that in comparison to all e ink screens or only the ones with the light, since screens with a light are less durable than those without? Basically- is the Aura HD more or less durable than the Kobo Touch or the Nook Simple Touch?
domani7 is offline   Reply With Quote