Quote:
Originally Posted by BeccaPrice
another take on Patterson's ad. I'm not totally certain of the point that's being made in this article, just as I'm not certain what Patterson's point was.
|
My take was that she was subtly and (oh-so-) politely telling Patterson he is "misinformed". That if he bothered to look at what is really going on, instead of relying on what he hears from his "sources", he would see there is no crisis needing him to spend money defending the old guard.
Reading between the lines, the first draft called him all sorts of appropriate names that she carefully edited out before sending it out.
