View Single Post
Old 04-25-2013, 11:31 PM   #12
grumbles
Addict
grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.grumbles ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
grumbles's Avatar
 
Posts: 238
Karma: 1500000
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Device: Pandigital Novel (Black), T-2 and 3, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abtacha View Post
Even the built in graphics solutions of current Intel CPUs will handle more (from 1920x1200 up to 2560x1600 depending on the specific CPU and Mainboard), same for AMD.
Dedicated graphic cards will go higher.
Yes but unless you are using display port or analog output you are still restricted to 1920 x 1080. I was looking at some boards with onboard video (Intel as it happens) and HDMI and dvi will limit you to 1080. If you want better you will have to go to either DisplayPort or ThunderBolt and these proprietary interconnect are going to cost. Again it's a chicken & egg. I dearly would like better but if I can't afford it, it might as well not exist. None of these interconnects (or cables) will be cheap (or inexpensive.)
grumbles is offline   Reply With Quote