View Single Post
Old 04-25-2013, 04:21 PM   #4
Pr.BarnArt
Addict
Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Pr.BarnArt ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Pr.BarnArt's Avatar
 
Posts: 394
Karma: 401800
Join Date: Jun 2011
Device: Pocketbook 902 / Ipad air/ kindle paperwhite
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hattie View Post
Thanks, Pr.BarnArt! I have no idea what you just said, but I thank you for saying it!
Sorry ,I thought it would be clear for you and /or others.
So just one more try.

When you use a metadata source plugin you can only put get an integer(not a decimal) value for the rating field.
In stead of using the rating field, I suggest to use the publisher-field to fill with the publishers name, followed by a seperator and then followed by the decimal rating. It is possible because the publisherfield is a text field.
To realize this you have to make a simple change to the goodread metadatasource plugin.

The result is that, with this plugin, you get the decimal rating in the publisherfield of your book (after the name of the publisher).

The second step would be: to make a function within calibre, which looks for the separator in the publisher field en then split the text in the name and the rating.
Then convert the rating (in text) to a decimal value, which can be placed in the rating collumn you mentioned .

Hope you understand, I did my best
Pr.BarnArt is offline   Reply With Quote