Thread: Content is it worth defraging
View Single Post
Old 04-25-2013, 10:25 AM   #12
hawhill
Wizard
hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.hawhill ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
hawhill's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,379
Karma: 2155307
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Goettingen, Germany
Device: Kindle Paperwhite, Kobo Mini
I doubt you will notice a difference on the Kindle. The device is slow overall, but fast enough to do its job. That said: You might get a small speed gain, yes. SD/MMC blocks (the built-in flash is a eMMC, so it's more like an SD-Card than like a modern SSD) are quite small and the protocol has means for reading consecutive blocks without issuing new commands. But then the overhead for reading individual blocks isn't that big either. And it won't need a lot of CPU power at that point as the hardware has support for SD/MMC storage anyway. Having you flash erase/write cycles eaten up by a "defrag" doesn't sound like a good idea overall. Especially so as the MMC is masking the real flash layout, like the erase block size, for which the access could be optimized otherwise.
hawhill is offline   Reply With Quote