Thread: Content is it worth defraging
View Single Post
Old 04-24-2013, 12:15 PM   #9
Mike L
Wizard
Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Mike L ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Mike L's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,479
Karma: 3846231
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Device: Kindle 3, Samsung Galaxy
Quote:
Quote: HTG Explains: Why Linux Doesn’t Need Defragmenting

Good link - but we're talking about the FAT 32 partition here
Surely this is not a question of Linux vs FAT 32, but rather flash drive vs traditional hard drive (the kind that spins).

The purpose of defragging is to move file clusters close to each other, so as to minimise movement of the read/write head. But flash drive don't have a read/write, and there is no benefit in making the files contiguous. It's just as fast to read two clusters that are "far apart" and ones that a contiguous.

At least, that's my understanding. I'm not a hardware expert.

Mike
Mike L is offline   Reply With Quote