Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeshadow
"acrobat footnote limit" 2nd hit 
"adobe footnote limit" would have been better: 1st an InDesign forum
But as soon as we suspected internal counter problems I looked for acrobat-specific stuff related to such.
If we further guess right and it's something in adobe's libraries let's try the indesgn fix:
Tell your client to try restart *note numbers for every chapter/part. if keeping the counter low helps, we got bull's eye.
Altough I really wonder about the figure 400.
Would it be something in usual maxint ranges I'd get it but 400!? |
Damn. I thought I'd tried every possible iteration of "footnote limit," "Acrobat footnote limit," etc., but maybe I just missed. I know that using "endnote" in the search terms was utter futility.
I think in his separated stories that the numbering is restarted, though, and I think it still happens. (
). I'll give those go today myself, and see if we still have the "missage." I want to get this to work, somehow, because--and I know everyone here will be surprised to hear me of all people say this: I think this is an important book. I mean...I think it matters. I'm really impressed with it, which has happened to me...fewer times than I have fingers. I can't wait to see how it does, and
what it does. (Obviously, not your basic fiction). ;-)
And, I agree....400? Doesn't that seem obscenely low? Or is their expectation that every academic or scholarly or ? manuscript in the world will not have foot/endnotes? What a boggle!
Thanks, Frees. I'll give it a shot and see what happens.
Hitch