Quote:
Originally Posted by Prestidigitweeze
2. According to Kobo's Customer Service, despite the apparent difference in processor names and speeds in the respective spec sheets of the Aura HD and the Glo, both use the exact same one.
|
Therefore, it *will* be slower than the Glo, regardless of what the CS rep says, if only slightly, especially if both are set to refresh the screen every page turn. There really is no way around this, unless they've added extra hardware that isn't in the Glo to help the CPU with rendering the screen.
Quote:
|
Additionally, Kobo's marketing calls the Aura's processor "20 [or 25, according to some news sources] percent faster than other readers." Because of the ambiguous wording, this percentage could include or disinclude the Glo.
|
Probably doesn't include the Glo, instead referring to the 800MHz Touch.