Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin
Apparently, not everyone agrees with you on that. I suspect the jury didn't, in fact, when they ruled against her.
|
Well, it was very clear that you don't agree with me on it, so 'not everyone' would have obviously been the answer to the question 'Does everybody agree with me on that'. But I didn't ask this question, so what could be the point of your post? Perhaps you are trying to suggest that I shouldn't say things that at least one person disagrees with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin
Think of it his way (it's a much better anlogy):
You're a lawyer. Say you want to hire a lawyer for your firm, to practicie a relatively specialized area of law. You need someone with particular training and experience. There are several headhunter companies that will eagerly send you candidates. One of them sends you a candidate that lied on their resume, about something that make a difference in your hiring decision.. You find out they knew this candidate had lied on their resume. Would you be likely to do business with them again? Or would you prefer one of their competitors?
|
The analogy doesn't work. When an employer needs a particular training and experience they say so in the job description. Did this actress apply for any roles where the production company specifically requested somebody with the real age under 40 years old as opposed to asking for someone who can play a character under 40?