Quote:
Originally Posted by David Munch
Freescale makes *many* different CPU's, so again you are assuming it is the same one.
For discussions sake, lets say it is the same CPU subfamily. Then I would assume it uses newer technology since it is 6 months younger. Of course, that is just my assumption, since the Aura has to push twice as many pixels as the Glo, and a 25% increase in CPU clock speed probably wouldn't result in 'faster page turns'.
|
I've noticed it's page turn speeds are being compared to the Touch in
various places (just one example 'cos I happen to have it open; too lazy to browse my history for the other refernces), which would definitely cover that 25% cited increase in page turn speed (most places just cite the number against other ereaders - but not specific ereaders).
EDIT: Frankly, until I see a comparison video with an Aura HD and a Glo, both set to refresh on every page, I'm just going to assume that it's either just marketing hype or shennanigans (by comparing its speeds to the Touch or other previous-generation ereader instead of the Glo).