Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin
Nobody in their right mind would call it criminal fraud, but that's not the only form of fraud. Civil fraud is still withing the bounds of what the investigative web site reserves the right to share info over. The reason the plaintiff considered her read age on IMDB a big deal is that it's considerd by the industry to be something of a "calling card" - it's an official, professional presence. Lying it in is exactly the same as lying on a resume. Nobody's going to go to jail for it, but it is grounds to be fired (as happens, somethings quite spectaularly).
|
Like I said, I don't think this would meet any
legal definition of fraud (criminal or in tort), and I think that word is getting thrown around quite a bit just because it sounds so salacious.
My comment was an aside, and not directly to address what you and Sil_liS are arguing about.