View Single Post
Old 04-15-2013, 06:01 PM   #72
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by taustin View Post
If, as everyone seems to agree, an IMDB pro account is something of a "busienss card" for the movie industry, providing deliberately false information is, at least arguably, fraudulent, and could have a negative effect on the usefulness (and business reputation) of the site. And as you quoted, they specifically reserve the right to share information for purposes of "Law enforcement, fraud protection, and court orders."
IMDb went looking for her date of birth when she requested the date that she submitted to be removed. They had no reason to go looking for her personal data, and she had the right to have the date that she gave removed.

The name that she uses is not her legal name. Do you also have a problem with that?


The mention of lying on a business card reminded me of something. It's completely silly, and I'm putting it under spoiler tags because it's an image. It has absolutely nothing to do with the current topic.
Spoiler:
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote