View Single Post
Old 04-15-2013, 01:23 PM   #68
Sil_liS
Wizard
Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sil_liS ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 4,896
Karma: 33602910
Join Date: Oct 2010
Device: PocketBook 903 & 360+
Quote:
Originally Posted by murraypaul View Post
No, it prohibits unjustified age discrimination.
And you don't think that it's unjust to reject an actress who looks 30 for the role of a 30 year old woman entirely based on her real age?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I'm certainly not a lawyer, but it seems that there must be some common-sense reason why it's not illegal for a production company to reject 40 year olds if they're looking for someone to play the part of a 5-year-old child.
Sarcasm?

I'm not clear on what point you are trying to make with this. The actress in question was looking for parts in 10+ year range, not 35+. She was going for roles where she can look the part, not roles fitting someone a fourth of her height.
Sil_liS is offline   Reply With Quote