View Single Post
Old 04-15-2013, 01:23 PM   #67
MovieBird
TuxSlash
MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.MovieBird ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
MovieBird's Avatar
 
Posts: 392
Karma: 2436547
Join Date: Oct 2009
Device: GlowNook
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
I'm certainly not a lawyer, but it seems that there must be some common-sense reason why it's not illegal for a production company to reject 40 year olds if they're looking for someone to play the part of a 5-year-old child.
That common sense reason would be because they cannot perform the requested duty, i.e. looking like a five year old child. The above mentioned act does not exempt an older person from being able to complete the paid for task. It only ensures that old people who are qualified to perform a job are not discriminated against.
MovieBird is offline   Reply With Quote