Isn't the purpose of science to narrowly answer one question, and then pose a lot of other questions that can't be answered without new block grants? Is that a rhetorical question, or did I just state a fact? How do you prove something is right or wrong, if quantum physics governs the universe? To be or not to be, that is a state of existence, or is it existentialism? What if Fat Abe were emaciated and only pretended to be heavy so he could join weight watchers? In an alternate reality, could he really be thin/fat, old/young, or rich/poor, without being either?
|